Schnitzhofer and Associates

Consulting Structural Engineers

 Staunton, Virginia: 540.448.8321

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Staff
  • Structural Services
  • Projects
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Contact
    • Our Locations
  • Schnitzhofer Building Contractors
You are here: Home / S&A Feeds / Insurance Claims: Structural Failure Analysis of Residential CMU Basement Wall

August 21, 2011

Insurance Claims: Structural Failure Analysis of Residential CMU Basement Wall

S&A was recently commissioned to conduct a structural analysis of a collapsed residential CMU basement wall, in the interest of determining the primary cause of collapse. The back story is irrelevent with regards to the structural forensic aspect of this case, but the launch of the investigation into who was at fault has enough lessons within it to merit a blog post all its own. You may even find that article here at a later date.

The subject property for our investigation cosisted of an approximately 24 x 60 ranch-style single story wood framed residence over a basement. The cmu basement collapse occurred at the rear of the residence near the midpoint along the length of the long wall. The basement wall had suffered complete collapse for a length extending approximately 17′-0″ in length, while the upper level floor framing remained, with the shape of the wood framed “box” above nearly perfectly in tact. (Upon completion of the final report, we made the determination that the wood framed structure had suffered less than $100.00 in consmetic damage to the interior finishes, and confined to only one area.)

Rear Elevation at Collapsed CMU Foundation Wall

During our site visit, we observed the following:

  • The backwall drain was either absent or installed at improper elevation.
  • Gravel was not present near the rear of the wall.
  • Clay soil was in place immediately adjacent to the exterior wall face below grade.
  • The connection of the floor joists to the top plate was either inadequate or absent.
  • Lateral translation of the base of the wall.
  • Absent wall reinforcement and grout.

Upon structural analysis of the observed collapsed wall, Schnitzhofer & Associates, LLC made the determination that the wall suffered collapse as a result of severe lateral displacement as a result of (or a combination therof) the following conditions:

  • Excessive back wall hydrostatic pressure.
  • Excessive back wall soil pressure.
  • Repeated frost heave resulting in severe bowing and cracking of the subject wall.
  • Inadequate reinforcement.
  • Inadequate shear reinforcement at wall base
  • Inadequate mechanical connector resistance (bracing) at the top of the wall.

By Jim Schnitzhofer Leave a Comment / Filed Under: S&A Feeds

About Jim Schnitzhofer

Jim is the president of Schnitzhofer & Associates, LLC with 15 years of experience in structural engineering and is licensed to practice in Virginia, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. He is a graduate of the University of South Florida in civil and structural engineering.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join Us on Social Media

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Recent Blog Posts

Historic Commercial – 29 East Beverley – Staunton, VA

St Olaf Catholic Church – Williamsburg, VA

Commercial Historic Preservation – Staunton, VA

Historic Structural Reinforcement

Coke Building – Preston Avenue Charlottesville, VA

Village at Woods Edge

Staunton

909 Greenville Avenue
Staunton, VA 24401
540.448.8321

Copyright © 2025 Schnitzhofer & Associates, LLC · Contact Us · Log in